|
Bishop Sklba on Archbishop Weakland Settlement
June 23, 2002
Many parishioners and others have asked me
how I am doing with all the turmoil in the Church these last few months.
I typically respond that I am OK. Certainly the stress has been intense.
However, I believe that in the end truth will out for good or ill.
Unfortunately, what is printed in the news media is not always complete
and leaves much to be desired. For the most part the Kenosha News has
been fair in reporting the events of these months. I cannot say the same
for the Milwaukee paper. Here is a good example. Last week, Bishop Richard
Sklba sent the following letter to you on our Archdiocesan website. Read
it to get his understanding of what really happened concerning the settlement
Archbishop Weakland made.
June 13, 2002
Doing the Truth in Love (Eph 4:15)
A Letter to the Catholics of Southeastern Wisconsin
Dear Friends:
At this moment in history we as a Church are simultaneously confronted
by very serious issues. The tragedy of sexual abuse of minors and the
way these matters have been treated by the Church at times over the years
haunts us. The cry of all those directly or indirectly wounded by that
crime echoes across our community and our nation. This crisis clearly
must be addressed by all of us with a commitment to truth, accountability,
and compassion demanded by the Gospel we try to live and preach.
At the very same time we are faced with the emotional impact of
the Archbishops public apology for his own actions twenty years
ago, and the further account of the legal settlement made in 1998.
Here is more information regarding that settlement from my perspective.
The settlement as I understood it then and now was:
An effort to bring closure to the allegation of Mr. Marcoux
that the Archbishop had interfered with his ability to promote the production
of his Christo-dramas in various diocesan locations throughout
the country. (The issue of the relationship was also in the background
at the time.)
An effort to resolve any litigation and disputes before the
expenditure of attorney fees and costs, and attendant risk, that could
well have exceeded the settlement amount.
Acceptance of a lawsuit would have occasioned endless, expensive
discovery and depositions.
The question of a scandal was present, undoubtedly, but the greater
concern for me at the time was the preservation of the resources of the
Archdiocese for the work of the Gospel and the needy. That was the way
I saw it. Others may have a different judgment in the matter, but the
legal and moral counsel I received led me to concur with the decision
to enter that settlement agreement.
Settlements of this nature use confidentiality to bring closure
for all parties. In this case I judged that it also protected any rights
of Mr. Marcoux. This is the reality, as I understood it, including the
silence and confidentiality provisions contained in the agreement.
The agreement was made within the canonical requirements of Church
law.
A full report of the origins of the money for the settlement is
being prepared for civil authorities as requested. Information about the
source of the settlement money is on the archdiocese web site.
Another issue facing us is the need for a new decision structure
to provide for further participation of lay leadership. That way the legitimate
questions of our people might be structurally addressed, and the confidence
of our people might be restored and preserved. Clearly, we have a way
to go in this matter. I am deeply sorry for the pain and the public confusion
caused by the manner in which we attempted to provide information.
I would certainly welcome any constructive suggestions offered by
parishes for ways in which we can move forward toward the healing and
the new beginning so deeply needed at this moment in time.
Now we move toward the meeting of bishops in Dallas. Achieving substantial
results will be an enormous challenge for all of us. Perhaps the greatest
challenge of the conference is to find a way to address multiple voices
and expectations.
Please pray for the wisdom and the courage we all need at this moment.
Such an action is not an escape from our responsibilities, but recognition
of the true source for any effective remedy. Peace.
Bishop Richard J. Sklba
Administrator, Archdiocese of Milwaukee
The central matter Bishop Sklba wanted to convey was the truth about the
reasons he concurred with the settlement. The Milwaukee paper, in its
article on this letter, omitted the central facts! Its omission gives
another reason for doubting the truth about whatever one reads in the
paper. I hope that my openness in sharing as much information as possible
with you, our parishioners, is seen as my attempt to keep you in
the loop as we continue our walk with the Lord. Though we are an
imperfect Church, we are still the People of God!
Return to Father Ken's
Archive Page
|
|