![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Marriage as Covenant There is much talk these days about how family
stability is an important part of the emotional growth of children.In
a recent study the authors showed that chances for successful lives increase
for those children born in families where the parents are married to one
another. At the same time we find fewer couples getting married as more
couples live together without anyone blinking an eye and, as one researcher
put it, a culture of acceptance of anything goes. These cultural
experiences contradict our understanding of Catholic marriage and we must
challenge them. More and more our Catholic understanding of marriage stands
in opposition to the understanding found in our society. Marriage in the Catholic view is a life-long
commitment to another that calls for emotional and sexual faithfulness
to that one person. The total gift of self of one spouse to another is
bound up in a union that cannot be divided. It means being intimate only
with ones spouse, both emotionally and physically. Since one cannot
give self totally to more than one person, the Catholic understanding
of marriage grew through the centuries to where it is today. A Catholic
marriage is a life-long, exclusive, and public commitment to ones
spouse. With the help of God in the sacrament, persons pledge themselves
to this life. In our history there have been two aspects
of this relationship that have developed and remain in place today, both
of which contribute something essential to our understanding of marriage.
The first comes from St. Augustine who had a relationship with a woman
and experienced the birth of a child before he converted to Christianity.
He never forgot this experience. His teaching, along with many since,
found its height in the Churchs code of law back in 1917, which
stated that marriage was a contract for the purpose of procreation and
education of children. The purpose emphasized in this understanding was
child rearing. Hence, if a married couple decides not to be open to having
children, we do not accept that marriage as being valid. The second traces its beginning before Augustine
to Roman law that termed marriage a union of a man and a woman and
a partnership of the whole life. This understanding of marriage
found itself restated in St. Thomas Aquinas and other medieval thinkers
and it emerged more clearly in the Churchs code of law in 1983.
Here marriage was called a covenant, a promise to faithfully live with
and support ones spouse. Hence, if a married couple decides not
to make a commitment to be faithful for life from the marriages
beginning, we do not accept that marriage as being valid. At the Second Vatican Council these two emphases
were joined. Marriage is not merely for the procreation of children.
Its nature as an indissoluble compact between two people and the good
of the children demand that the mutual love of the partners be properly
shown, that it should grow and mature. In this view, openness to
children was seen as one of the essential elements of marriage, not its
main purpose. Marriage, then, is important to the life of Catholics. What are we to do with the lack of marriage
or with couples living together without marriage? Loving the persons involved
is not the same as endorsing their way of living. In fact, endorsing or
agreeing with their living together promotes their actions. The culture
of acceptance grows and marriages are weakened. The couples and their
contemporaries then think that marriage truly makes no difference. Why
should they bother with getting married? In the eyes of the Church effects
do follow from living together without marriage. Since the couple living together without
marriage is living in a state of concubinage, that is, in serious sin,
they are not allowed to participate fully in the life of the community.
This means that they should not receive Holy Communion and cannot be involved
in other ministries such as Eucharistic Minister or Reader at Mass. Others
in the community are scandalized when people who are widely known to be
living with someone out of wedlock act in these roles. This is not a punishment
imposed by the Church. This is the natural result of the choices people
make in their lives. I suspect that many people have lost trust
in others. Our society seems to be indifferent or even hostile to faithfulness,
permanent commitments, and spiritual support in daily life. Nowhere does
this societal stance affect us more than in our marriages and family life.
The way to combat this growing cancer is not by agreeing and going along
with it. Rather, it is in going against our societys approach in
our daily lives, showing that monogamous, life-long marriages are not
only possible, but are essential to happiness and human growth and development. The effects of successfully living our understanding
of marriage will be seen in our lives. Couples will have a chance at happiness
and fulfillment. Children will have stable homes in which they can grow
and mature normally. Families will be the backbone and strength of our
country and Church. Living without such a goal will lead us to disaster, indications of which are already all around us. Living with high expectations of marriage will make a difference and make a necessary challenge to a culture of acceptance. Marriage is not easy. We, as Catholics, offer the world faith and communion: faith in a God whose love shines in marriage, and communion of two married people who let nothing come between them and live lives of fidelity empowered by God. This is our vision. Sadly, it is not the vision of the society in which we live. |
|
||